I believe that Carr believes that Google is not
necessarily “making us stupid” but it is definitely lowering a certain aspect
of our intelligence. Carr says that the way the Internet is set up it is
subconsciously making us skim through things rather than read something fully
and then move on. There are so many different ads or links on a website that it
is hard to focus on one thing. If you are reading The New York Times online you
might be reading an article and another headline in the margin pops up and
diverts your attention. Carr makes a comparison regarding this: “Once I was a
scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a
Jet Ski”. With this comparison, I believe that Carr also wants to make the
point that we used to read lengthy books but now we read short online articles.
The Internet, Google especially, has focused are attention on a more
picture-based intelligence. Hedge also refers to this picture-based
intelligence by saying that “images and slogans are all [the less
literate population]
understand”. Hedge portrays
a somewhat depressing picture of our nation today by showing how the illiterate
portion of our population cannot actually understand enough to do with bank
loans, mortgages, taxes, or even voting for a president that could help their
situation. Because they cannot understand forms and contracts their houses are
being foreclosed and they are becoming bankrupt. I also liked how Hedge pointed
out that the presidents do not need to be as intelligent as they used to be;
they just have to seem intelligent.
In
Carr’s article he quotes one of the men who co-founded Google: “Certainly if
you had all the world’s information directly attached to your brain, or an
artificial brain that was smarter than your brain, you’d be better off”. To me,
this definitely does not seem like the right solution. Would we always have
this knowledge or would we have to earn it? Do we have to learn the basic
skills and then we attain this knowledge or do we have to graduate high school
or college to get all of this information? Similar to Carr’s argument, I think
that if this were the case today, if we all had a computer for a brain, we
would become less intelligent. If we had all the knowledge of the world in our
brains we wouldn’t have the need to be curious; we wouldn’t want to travel the
world; we wouldn’t need to read anything. Also, I think that all that
information would lower the need for human interactions and our world would
start to look more like the world in the movie “Wall-E”.
No comments:
Post a Comment